[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 8, Number 29 (3-2017) ::
ادبستان 2017, 8(29): 188-158 Back to browse issues page
Anology or Self-Olorification
Amene Rostami *, Mohammad Hasan Hasanzade Niri, Sara Farzane
Ph.D. Candidate in Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University of Karaj, Karaj, Iran
Abstract:   (261 Views)

Satan adventure in Gnosticism is so disputative. His disobedience in prostrate to Adam is the important topic discussion of Muslem Gnostics. Sam of gnostic eminents have such different opinion towards him, not even defend him but they know him innocent. In this article, we study the view points of two Gnostics: Jalal Al Din Mohamad balkhi (Rumi) and Ein Al-ghozat Hamedani. Results of this study show us that Ein Al-ghozat issues the defence theory of Satan and proves it by Gnosticism causes. In contrast, Rumi has opposite opinion and knows him as exiled from divine court.

Keywords: Satan, Jalal Al Din Mohamad balkhi (Rumi), Ein Alghozat Hamedani.
Full-Text [PDF 424 kb]   (52 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/07/9 | Accepted: 2017/07/9 | Published: 2017/07/9
Add your comments about this article
Your username or email:

Write the security code in the box >



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rostami A, Hasanzade Niri M H, Farzane S. Anology or Self-Olorification. ادبستان. 2017; 8 (29) :188-158
URL: http://erfaniyat.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-325-en.html
Volume 8, Number 29 (3-2017) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه عرفانیات در ادب فارسی Erfaniyat Dar Adab Farsi
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.046 seconds with 797 queries by yektaweb 3506