:: Volume 8, Issue 29 (3-2017) ::
ادبستان 2017, 8(29): 188-158 Back to browse issues page
Anology or Self-Olorification
Amene Rostami *, Mohammad Hasan Hasanzade Niri , Sara Farzane
Ph.D. Candidate in Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University of Karaj, Karaj, Iran
Abstract:   (320 Views)

Satan adventure in Gnosticism is so disputative. His disobedience in prostrate to Adam is the important topic discussion of Muslem Gnostics. Sam of gnostic eminents have such different opinion towards him, not even defend him but they know him innocent. In this article, we study the view points of two Gnostics: Jalal Al Din Mohamad balkhi (Rumi) and Ein Al-ghozat Hamedani. Results of this study show us that Ein Al-ghozat issues the defence theory of Satan and proves it by Gnosticism causes. In contrast, Rumi has opposite opinion and knows him as exiled from divine court.

Keywords: Satan, Jalal Al Din Mohamad balkhi (Rumi), Ein Alghozat Hamedani.
Full-Text [PDF 424 kb]   (72 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/07/9 | Accepted: 2017/07/9 | Published: 2017/07/9



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Volume 8, Issue 29 (3-2017) Back to browse issues page