Volume 8, Issue 31 (9-2017)
عرفانیات در ادب فارسی 2017, 8(31): 50-68 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
ghanizade A. Investigating and criticizing the “in tasavvof” parable anecdote from “Maghamat Hamidi” book a case study based on the Structuralism Rules. عرفانیات در ادب فارسی 2017; 8 (31) :50-68
URL: http://erfaniyat.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-304-en.html
URL: http://erfaniyat.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-304-en.html
Assistant professor of Payame Noor University of Iran, Iran , ab.gh9966@gmail.com
Abstract: (2868 Views)
Penned by Ghazi Hamiddein Aboubakr ibn-e Omar ibn-e Mahmoud, Maghamat-e Hamidi includes 24 maqama, i.e. short stories and one epilogue. It is a well-known prose work dating back to 3rd century AH with rich figures of speech. In this study, four sample mystical maqamas on Sufism are analyzed based on structuralism framework. It is concluded that the essence of this literary work has been always ethical-mystical sermons. The author of Maghamat has employed wording and compoundings throughout the work and the consistent mode of the prose has been intact from the start to the end. Ghazi Hamiddein's main goal was advice, and he has stuck to rhyme and eloquent Arabic and Persian expressions with innovative moves in quotation Persian and Arabic poems.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2017/05/13 | Accepted: 2017/08/19 | Published: 2017/09/23
Received: 2017/05/13 | Accepted: 2017/08/19 | Published: 2017/09/23
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
