Volume 8, Issue 29 (3-2017)
عرفانیات در ادب فارسی 2017, 8(29): 188-158 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rostami A, Hasanzade Niri M H, Farzane S. Anology or Self-Olorification. عرفانیات در ادب فارسی 2017; 8 (29) :188-158
URL: http://erfaniyat.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-325-en.html
URL: http://erfaniyat.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-325-en.html
1- Ph.D. Candidate in Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University of Karaj, Karaj, Iran
2- Assistant professor in Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University of North Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant professor in Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University of North Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (2405 Views)
Satan adventure in Gnosticism is so disputative. His disobedience in prostrate to Adam is the important topic discussion of Muslem Gnostics. Sam of gnostic eminents have such different opinion towards him, not even defend him but they know him innocent. In this article, we study the view points of two Gnostics: Jalal Al Din Mohamad balkhi (Rumi) and Ein Al-ghozat Hamedani. Results of this study show us that Ein Al-ghozat issues the defence theory of Satan and proves it by Gnosticism causes. In contrast, Rumi has opposite opinion and knows him as exiled from divine court.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2017/07/9 | Accepted: 2017/07/9 | Published: 2017/07/9
Received: 2017/07/9 | Accepted: 2017/07/9 | Published: 2017/07/9
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
