According to Einoil ghozat Hamedani knowledge is: “there is no sense of it but with similar words” since these words made for other meanings, when they are heared, their apparent meaning is understand inevitably for this reason the words that used by mystic are a trap for class scholarsm and argumentary and controversy scholars.
This study consider the history of epistemic issues in Greek philosophy and Islamic Sufism (mystics treatment of knowledge) and nature of self in perspective of Greek and Iranian governors and then it explaine and analysis the nature of self and self-knowledge in perspective of Einolghozat Hamedani that the of self-knowledge in his perspective including of: knowledge bases, judge stressed on incumbency of gaining knowledge, ways of gaining knowledge orders of know ledge in perspective of Einalghozat, intuitive knowledge.
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |